United States Warned Moscow weeks in advance of the assault that the Crocus City performance hall was a 1 terrorist target.

The United States Warned Moscow weeks in advance of the assault that the Crocus City performance hall was a terrorist target.

 

Recently revealed information from American authorities indicates that the United States government issued a warning to Russian counterparts about the possibility of the prominent entertainment site, Crocus City Hall, serving as a potential target for terrorists, nearly three weeks ahead of the devastating incident in Moscow. Tragically, this assault claimed the lives of approximately 150 innocent individuals.

This development forms part of a growing body of evidence casting doubt on statements made by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who previously maintained that insufficient particularity characterized U.S. intelligence reports, hindering efforts to thwart the catastrophic event. Furthermore, he refuted claims linking ISIS to the fatalities resulting from the attack.

The Washington Post article delving into the specifics surrounding the pre-attack notification raises questions pertaining to Russia’s failure to adequately prepare for the tragic episode, culminating in the demise of at least 144 individuals, among whom were six minors.

Renowned Russian figure, Vladimir Solovyov, infamous for disseminating propaganda, likened the magnitude of this distressing event to Al-Qaeda’s notorious September 11 attacks on New York during an exchange with American conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

In response to escalating concerns, the National Security Council of Washington acknowledged sharing intelligence related to a purportedly imminent terrorist strike intended for Moscow, neglecting, however, to explicitly reference Crocus City Hall.

 

Confidential sources divulged to media outlets that Washington communicated a message to Moscow on March 6, conveying apprehensions about the vulnerability of Crocus City Hall as a conceivable target. This reciprocal information transfer embodies the universal “duty to warn” doctrine upheld by nations worldwide, transcending diplomatic nuances and political inclinations.

Following the disturbing revelation, the US Embassy issued a press release acknowledging heightened surveillance measures employed to track evolving developments, stating that it was closely watching reports indicating intentions held by radical elements to launch strikes on sizable congregations in Moscow, specifically highlighting musical performances as potential targets.

Sergei Naryshkin, Director of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Agency, responded to these accusations on Tuesday, characterizing the US warning as excessively vague and thus impractical to act upon. Meanwhile, the Kremlin has refrained from issuing official remarks addressing the mounting controversy.

According to Interfax, Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service Director, Sergei Naryshkin, expressed sentiments suggesting that the ambiguity inherent in the US warning prevented complete identification of those accountable for perpetrating the abhorrent offense.

Three days before the unfortunate occurrence on March 22, Russian President Vladimir Putin dismissed the alleged US security threats as blatant coercion tactics, describing them instead as illicit maneuvers designed to intimidate and destabilize the societal fabric of the nation.

ALSO READ:-https://todayusnews.in/uncover-the-secrets/

Subsequent to the distressing event, Islamic State-Khorasan, a splinter faction originating from the broader Islamic State network, assumed liability for the attack within a span of twenty-four hours. Promptly thereafter, President Vladimir Putin directed blame toward Ukraine, with a conspicuous absence of corroborative material accompanying his claim.

Overseas dignitaries representing the United States, United Kingdom, and France have since articulated their shared belief in the legitimacy of Islamic State-Khorasan assuming responsibility for this deplorable incident.

 

Eventually conceding that Islamist militants linked to the Islamic State executed the massacre, President Vladimir Putin nevertheless continued investigatory proceedings, obliquely referencing suspected involvement from Ukraine, which vehemently rejects any association with the tragedy.

Specialists have sounded alarms, expressing concern that Putin might capitalize on the situation to amplify confrontational relations with neighboring Ukraine, subsequently galvanizing additional support for what he terms his “specialized military undertaking”—an indirect euphemistic expression.

Persisting in his accusations, Putin continues to incriminate Ukraine for instigating “terrorist” actions domestically within Russian territory, pointing to Ukrainian drones penetrating western regions and striking nearby petroleum refineries, coupled with financial assistance extended to dissident paramilitary organizations operating in proximity to Belgorod and Kursk borderlands, carrying out cross-border sabotage missions.

Asserting authority without substantiation, Putin maintains that law enforcement agencies successfully detained the quartet of gunmen liable for the Crocus City Hall massacre as they journeyed towards Ukraine, raising suspicions regarding the authenticity of his claims.

Contrarily, Belarus’ leader, Alexander Lukashenko, presented an alternative narrative, declaring that the assailants initially targeted Belarus as their intended destination, emphasizing the geographical connection between the Eastern European nation and the Kremlin.

Russia’s Defense Ministry announced that around 16,000 civilians have entered contractual agreements with the armed forces postdating the Crocus City Hall explosion, with numerous recruits professing a compelling urge to seek retribution for the victims slain in the shocking disaster on March 22.

The Russian Ministry of Defense’s statistics on military recruiting cannot be accepted at face value, and Today US News was unable to confirm these data. Nevertheless, regardless of who is to blame, the allegations support theories that Putin would exploit the strike to further his campaign in Ukraine.

ALSO READ:-https://dharmikvartalapkendra.online/mercury/